left biblioblography: Profiles In Atheism - The Jailed Journalist

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

Profiles In Atheism - The Jailed Journalist

I learned of this via Jonathan Miller's A Brief History of Disbelief (links to be found at my dear friend, Beep's blog) - and the history is most...illuminating.

"Richard Carlile (9 December 179010 February 1843) was an important agitator for the establishment of universal suffrage and freedom of the press in the United Kingdom.

Early life

"He was born in Ashburton, Devon, the son of a shoemaker who abandoned the family in 1794 leaving Richard's mother struggling to support her three children on the income from running a small shop. At the age of six he went for free education to the local Church of England school, then at the age of twelve he left school for a seven year apprenticeship to a tinsmith in Plymouth. In 1813 he got married, and shortly afterwards the couple moved to Holborn Hill in London where he found work as a tinsmith. Jane Carlile gave birth to five children, three of whom survived.

Politics and publishing

"His interest in politics was kindled first by economic conditions in the winter of 1816 when Carlile was put on short-time work by his employer creating serious problems for the family: "I shared the general distress of 1816 and it was this that opened my eyes." He began attending political meetings where speakers like Henry Hunt complained that only three men in a hundred had the vote, and was also influenced by the publications of William Cobbett.

"As a way of making a living he sold the writings of parliamentary reformers such as Tom Paine on the streets of London, often walking "thirty miles for a profit of eighteen pence". In April 1817 he formed a publishing business with the printer William Sherwin and rented a shop in Fleet Street. To make political texts such as Paine's books The Rights of Man and the Principles of Government available to the poor he split them into sections which he sold as small pamphlets, similarly publishing The Age of Reason and Principles of Nature. He issued pirated copies of Southey's Wat Tyler and after the radical William Hone's arrest in May, he reissued the parody of parts of the Book of Common Prayer for which Hone was to be tried, then was himself arrested in August and held without charge until Hone was acquitted in December.

"He took on distributing the banned Radical weekly The Black Dwarf at a time when the government was prosecuting publishers: "The Habeas Corpus Act being suspended ... all was terror and alarm, but I take credit to myself in defeating the effect of these two Acts upon the Press... Of imprisonment I made sure, but I felt inclined to court it than to shrink from it".

"Carlile then brought out a radical journal, Sherwin's Political Register, which reported political meetings and included extracts from books and poems by supporters of the reform movement such as Percy Bysshe Shelley and Lord Byron. The popularity of this helped to soon bring his profit from his publishing venture to £50 a week.

Peterloo and The Republican

"Carlile was one of the scheduled main speakers at the reform meeting on 16 August 1819 at St. Peter's Fields in Manchester. Just as Henry Hunt was about to speak, the crowd was attacked by the yeomanry in what became known as the Peterloo massacre. Carlile escaped and was hidden by radical friends before he caught the mail coach to London and published his eyewitness account, giving the first full report of what had happened, in Sherwin's Weekly Political Register of 18 August 1819. His placards proclaimed "Horrid Massacres at Manchester".

"The government responded by closing Sherwin's Political Register, confiscating the stock of newspapers and pamphlets. Carlile changed the name to The Republican and in its issue of 27 August 1819 demanded that "The massacre... should be the daily theme of the Press until the murderers are brought to justice.... Every man in Manchester who avows his opinions on the necessity of reform, should never go unarmed – retaliation has become a duty, and revenge an act of justice."

"Carlile was prosecuted for blasphemy, blasphemous libel and sedition for publishing material that might encourage people to hate the government in his newspaper, and for publishing Tom Paine's Common Sense, The Rights of Man and the Age of Reason (which criticised the Church of England). In October 1819 he was found guilty of blasphemy and seditious libel and sentenced to three years in Dorchester Gaol with a fine of £1,500. When he refused to pay the fine, his premises in Fleet Street were raided and his stock was confiscated. While he was in jail he continued to write articles for The Republican which was now published by Carlile's wife Jane, and thanks to the publicity it now outsold pro-government newspapers such as The Times.

"To curb newspapers the government had raised the ½d tax on newspapers first imposed in 1712 to 3½d in 1797 then 4d in 1815. From December 1819 it set a minimum price of 7d and further restrictions. At a time when workers earned less than 10 shillings (120d.) a week this made it hard for them to afford radical newspapers, and publishers tried various strategies to evade the tax. Groups would pool their resources in reading societies and subscription societies to purchase a book or journal in common, and frequently read it aloud to one another as was the case with James Wilson (Scottish Revolutionary).

"By 1821, Carlile was a declared atheist and published his Address to Men of Science, in favour of materialism and education. In the same year Jane Carlile was in turn sentenced to two years imprisonment for seditious libel, and her place as publisher was taken by Richard Carlile's sister, Mary. Within six months she was imprisoned for the same offence. The process was repeated with eight of his shop workers, and over 150 men and women were sent to prison for selling The Republican. Carlile's sentence ended in 1823 but he was immediately arrested and returned to prison for not paying his £1,500 fine, so the process continued until he was eventually released on 25 November 1825. In the next edition of The Republican he expressed the hope that his long confinement would result in the freedom to publish radical political ideas.

"He then published further journals, The Lion which campaigned against child labour and The Promptor. He argued that "equality between the sexes" should be the objective of all reformers, and in 1826 published Every Woman's Book advocating birth control and the sexual emancipation of women."

Ironic, is it not, that his publication was named the Republican, of all things, given it's current definition?

Amazing. What is it about free-thinkers, that we believe that women should have equal rights, birth control, freedom of religion as well as freedom of expression?

This is far from topical: by and large, secular humanists seem to share this preoccupation throughout the ages.

That is, when they're allowed to speak.

Stumble Upon Toolbar


beepbeepitsme said...

RE: "What is it about free-thinkers, that we believe that women should have equal rights, birth control, freedom of religion as well as freedom of expression?

This is far from topical: by and large, secular humanists seem to share this preoccupation throughout the ages."

They are the same issues over and over again. And the groups that have the most interest in removing freethought have predominately been religious ones.

beepbeepitsme said...

Oh, and thanks for the mention. :)

BEAJ said...

I still find it fascinating when it comes to the pre-Darwin, pre-knowing of an ancient earth atheists.
Intuitively they could conclude that God doesn't exist, but they didn't have a lot of science to fill in gaps.
I'm almost convinced that many of these atheists rejected God on the basis of bible contradictions when it came to God and maybe even rejected God out of spite and hated God out of existence.
I think both of these factors are still alive today, but I think science creates many atheists. Wasn't it evolution that pushed Dawkins into our camp?

Krystalline Apostate said...

BBIM - hey, de nada, mi amiga.
BEAJ - yeah, that's a tough nut to crack. Not a whole lot on pre-Darwin atheist thoughts in that regard: it does go as far back as Anaximander (610) BCE, Darwin/Russel came up w/the most convincing explanation.
I think you're right about Dawkins: in either the Watchmaker or Delusion, he mentions how outrageous he found evolution to be, & decided to debunk it.
The rest, as they say, is history.