tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post6586416951045965412..comments2023-07-08T06:13:19.344-07:00Comments on biblioblography: Profiles In Atheism: The Jurist of JurisprudenceKrystalline Apostatehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comBlogger19125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-90112011480262705412007-07-29T00:13:00.000-07:002007-07-29T00:13:00.000-07:00karen - tkbudpie is cute, in a weird sorta way.You...karen - tkbudpie is cute, in a weird sorta way.<BR/>You got my permission, doll. ;)Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-33590324498452864182007-07-28T09:28:00.000-07:002007-07-28T09:28:00.000-07:00I was just reading the comments and had to write s...I was just reading the comments and had to write something because my word verification below is "tkbudpie".<BR/><BR/>tk budpie, I like that, for some reason. Sounds like a good screen name.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-58414638823785817662007-07-28T08:13:00.000-07:002007-07-28T08:13:00.000-07:00Problem w/overflow's been fixed. I had a javascrip...Problem w/overflow's been fixed. I had a javascript problem w/CoComment. <BR/>Sorry.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-5118090752055659632007-07-28T07:47:00.000-07:002007-07-28T07:47:00.000-07:00remy - I thought she was on vacation? I don't know...remy - I thought she was on vacation? I don't know, to be honest.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-80654455363910523242007-07-28T05:21:00.000-07:002007-07-28T05:21:00.000-07:00Why, yes, it does."Stack overflow at line:2" By th...Why, yes, it does.<BR/><BR/>"Stack overflow at line:2" <BR/><BR/>By the way, have you any idea what has happened to Beep Beep?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-74166916323220021002007-07-27T21:19:00.000-07:002007-07-27T21:19:00.000-07:00remy - does it give a line #?Karen - yeah, it's ab...remy - does it give a line #?<BR/><BR/>Karen - yeah, it's about the closest anyone can get to any sort of immortality.<BR/><BR/>niran?<BR/>All law is man made.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-61995268769999054012007-07-27T11:30:00.000-07:002007-07-27T11:30:00.000-07:00I am also getting the 'overflow" message.I am also getting the 'overflow" message.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-19600407175608387772007-07-27T11:23:00.000-07:002007-07-27T11:23:00.000-07:00So Bentham had himself displayed after death, eh? ...So Bentham had himself displayed after death, eh? When I first saw the title of the post and the picture, I thought this was the proverbial atheist closet come to life!<BR/><BR/>I'm using Mozilla Foxfire, and while I didn't get any error message, it did take some time to load today, instead of popping right up as usual.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-56454263873155590392007-07-26T20:58:00.000-07:002007-07-26T20:58:00.000-07:00Mate, do you have an argument?Mate, do you have an argument?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-41156949199102282482007-07-26T06:33:00.000-07:002007-07-26T06:33:00.000-07:00niran - I didn't say any of that, did I? You keep...niran - I didn't say any of that, did I? You keep inserting interpretations between the lines that aren't there.<BR/>So sorry, but it's not so sad. Not even close.<BR/>You keep mentioning jurisprudence, no? I'm guessing you're an advocate of the Naturalist school of thought?<BR/>As to your criticism of my profiles, I'm not going to change my approach - so you may as well drop that. Ad hominem isn't a valid form of debate.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-57087836034434027412007-07-25T23:39:00.000-07:002007-07-25T23:39:00.000-07:00up for what dude?? Its not like the copy and paste...up for what dude?? Its not like the copy and paste of some entry on Bentham constitutes an argument. Bentham is respected because of his work on positivism. His utilitarian thesis, while attractive would still justify the sherriff's murder of the innocent in the pursuit of public order. The felicific calculus swings heavily in favour of the sheriff if the riot would be potentially dangerous. So there, it'd help if you actually read up round the names you drop here. What's your argument though? That morality stems from utilitarian considerations? I thought you were one who believed in the golden rule, and those two don't always sit well together mate;-)...so sad.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-48873308350313848892007-07-25T21:21:00.000-07:002007-07-25T21:21:00.000-07:00Well, niran? You up for it? Where'd you go?Well, niran? You up for it? Where'd you go?Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-58985517471861031442007-07-25T06:30:00.000-07:002007-07-25T06:30:00.000-07:00Aaron - what line # is it telling you?I've only hi...Aaron - what line # is it telling you?<BR/>I've only hit 3 complaints (on blogger) about this - 2 talk about IE.<BR/>Let me know, thanks.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-73321256326500531362007-07-25T06:11:00.000-07:002007-07-25T06:11:00.000-07:00Hi Aaron. Stack overflow? Which browser are you us...Hi Aaron. Stack overflow? Which browser are you using?<BR/>I wonder if that's happening to anyone else.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-39706912503178753332007-07-24T22:04:00.000-07:002007-07-24T22:04:00.000-07:00Hey KA,Why am I getting a stack overflow erro when...Hey KA,<BR/><BR/>Why am I getting a stack overflow erro when I visit your blog? Is anyone else getting this or am I just retarded? :(Aaron Kinneyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12059982934663353474noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-26588089089290142762007-07-24T20:27:00.000-07:002007-07-24T20:27:00.000-07:00niran - no, it really hasn't bothered me that much...niran - no, it really hasn't bothered me that much. In fact, I find it fascinating, & thanks for the heads up.<BR/>Nor was it a 'copy 'n paste job' - just a simple nod to people in the past.<BR/><B>Denial through ignorance is a little pathetic.</B><BR/>As per usual, you read what you like into what biases you pack around like oversized luggage.<BR/>I've denied nothing. Poisoning the well. <BR/>As usual, you came a-runnin'. Predictable.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-81249328190252718402007-07-23T20:43:00.000-07:002007-07-23T20:43:00.000-07:00haha...this has really bothered you hasn't it. Ben...haha...this has really bothered you hasn't it. Bentham's utilitarianism should be of concern to those who subscribe to the golden rule or the categorical imperative because it could for instance, be used to justify the killing of an innocent man by the sheriff in a riot for the purpose of preventing the deaths of other lives. I think these copy and paste jobs really don't do any service to the "province of jurisprudence" so to speak... You might want to check out Mill's rule utilitariansim which tries to plug the holes in Bentham's thesis. <BR/><BR/>Oh and by the way, the ought-is dichotomy is at the heart of jurisprudential debate since the atheist Hume. Denial through ignorance is a little pathetic.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-52558287044773441052007-07-23T20:17:00.000-07:002007-07-23T20:17:00.000-07:00Hey, possum, how are ya?Hume is...daunting, to say...Hey, possum, how are ya?<BR/>Hume is...daunting, to say the least. Of all the philosophers, he was a toughie.<BR/>I'll be doing a profile on him sometime soon, but it may be more than 1 post. <BR/>He really opened some doors in his day.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-6374402635098060222007-07-23T11:58:00.000-07:002007-07-23T11:58:00.000-07:00Nice post. :) I'd never heard of the If-Ought arg...Nice post. :) I'd never heard of the If-Ought argument.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com