tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post4251483358535462771..comments2023-07-08T06:13:19.344-07:00Comments on biblioblography: Allegories Gone Wild - The Mathematical MadmanKrystalline Apostatehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-82655368595105121502007-10-31T23:32:00.000-07:002007-10-31T23:32:00.000-07:00does anyone mind if a random passerby giggles?i wa...does anyone mind if a random passerby giggles?<BR/><BR/>i wasn't sure if there was someone to alert. anyways, i did.<BR/><BR/>my thanks to those who take the time to to publicly dunce lance. : )Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-42699121001625907052007-09-15T11:50:00.000-07:002007-09-15T11:50:00.000-07:00As for his suspicions or carbon dating, he's fully...<B>As for his suspicions or carbon dating, he's fully justified.</B><BR/>Umm...no, he's fully nuts.<BR/>Check out this <A HREF="http://www.answers.com/topic/how-does-radiocarbon-dating-or-carbon-14-dating-work" REL="nofollow">link</A> for an accurate description of how carbon dating works. It applies to <I>organic</I> tissue. <BR/><B>There's ample evidence indicating that the Earth is much younger that some would like to admit. </B><BR/>Oh, do please avoid the argumentum ad Hovind, as that will prove most embarrassing.<BR/><B>The ramifications of what Astrophysicists, Geophysicists and Mathematicians have published has created a stir amongst those who are Darwinists.</B><BR/>Such as who, who & who? Mathematicians? You're going to have to provide sources, as I'm not too big on the 'those guys (who I can't name) said so' crapola.<BR/><B>Interestingly enough, there's ample support from agnostic, hindu and other non-Christian scientists concerning younger earth theory.</B><BR/>Do be so kind as to name drop.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-90348610774963906862007-09-15T11:30:00.000-07:002007-09-15T11:30:00.000-07:00Despite being a brilliant mathematician, Fomenko's...Despite being a brilliant mathematician, Fomenko's research is flawed and his statistal methods are suspect. Unaccounted astonomical phenomena, inadequate quantification of history and forced pattern matching are but a few of the problems with his research. As for his suspicions or carbon dating, he's fully justified. There's ample evidence indicating that the Earth is much younger that some would like to admit. The ramifications of what Astrophysicists, Geophysicists and Mathematicians have published has created a stir amongst those who are Darwinists. They usually label these facts as coming from Christians with an agenda to disprove the Darwinist hypothesis. Interestingly enough, there's ample support from agnostic, hindu and other non-Christian scientists concerning younger earth theory. I think the embarrassment of admitting one is wrong or simply doesn't know shows the level of arrogance and pride man is capable of acheiving.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-27370493764712747662007-06-26T19:54:00.000-07:002007-06-26T19:54:00.000-07:00hey david.In my limited experience, answers.com ar...hey david.<BR/><B>In my limited experience, answers.com articles are exact copies of Wikipedia articles, except that they are not always copies of the latest version.</B><BR/>True enough, as answers.com is an extension of wiki: however, as I've stated before, it has far <I>more</I> cross-reference materials.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-10487187141429716352007-06-26T08:36:00.000-07:002007-06-26T08:36:00.000-07:00Zac - that's a good point, I've seen Wiki be wrong...<I>Zac - that's a good point, I've seen Wiki be wrong on more than 1 occasions. However, I go to answers.com - it cites extra references, such as the Britannica, Encyclopedia, etc.</I><BR/><BR/>In my limited experience, answers.com articles are <B>exact copies</B> of Wikipedia articles, except that they are not always copies of the latest version.<BR/><BR/>Depending on the topic and on who happens to have edited them, many articles contain plenty of citations of the primary literature. Check out some physics or linguistics articles for example.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-9092582020401494432007-03-27T10:01:00.000-07:002007-03-27T10:01:00.000-07:00KABirds of a feather?Love you too, my dear.KA<BR/>Birds of a feather?<BR/><BR/>Love you too, my dear.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-58836914725777598012007-03-26T23:00:00.000-07:002007-03-26T23:00:00.000-07:00karen - how odd it is, that I find you w/in range ...karen - how odd it is, that I find you w/in range then.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-25573057296881935982007-03-26T20:45:00.000-07:002007-03-26T20:45:00.000-07:00Oh, my, that's even FARTHER out there! ;)Never let...<B>Oh, my, that's even FARTHER out there! ;)</B><BR/><BR/>Never let it be said that I am not OUT THERE!!! I'm pretty sure my friends, family and therapist will all attest to that! ;)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-19275099997054360502007-03-26T18:14:00.000-07:002007-03-26T18:14:00.000-07:00Zac - that's a good point, I've seen Wiki be wrong...Zac - that's a good point, I've seen Wiki be wrong on more than 1 occasions. However, I go to answers.com - it cites extra references, such as the Britannica, Encyclopedia, etc. <BR/>I checked around. It seems to be on the up & up.<BR/>Oh, I forgot this: Gary Kasparov supports his theories.<BR/>I'll drop him an email: maybe we can get a rebuttal.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-70624027825318732772007-03-26T16:30:00.000-07:002007-03-26T16:30:00.000-07:00I think the only conspiracy here worth researching...I think the only conspiracy here worth researching regards these facts: "a full member (Academician) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences and the International Higher Education Academy of Sciences, as well as a doctor of physics and mathematics, a professor, and head of the Differential Geometry Department of the Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics in Moscow State University."<BR/><BR/>It was from wikipedia afterall, who, among other grand errors, pronounced the comedian Sinbad dead, twice, last week.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-2337417718598117772007-03-26T15:45:00.000-07:002007-03-26T15:45:00.000-07:00KA,I DID like it! Especially the last part, which...KA,<BR/><BR/>I DID like it! Especially the last part, which is where I go first when attacking ID. "So, you say there's a designer. I prefer Xenu. Or maybe the Rigellians. It's a tough call." Like that. <BR/><BR/>Then, y'know, the theology starts to come out RIGHT QUICK. ;)Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13363174213866492800noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-82963847754854857702007-03-26T13:21:00.000-07:002007-03-26T13:21:00.000-07:00Yeah, this guy indulges in ipse dixit so regularly...Yeah, this guy indulges in ipse dixit so regularly, he IS the authority. He's probably smarter than I am: that doesn't make him more correct.<BR/><BR/>BBIM:<BR/><B>I just solved the riddle. God did it.</B><BR/>Who? ;)<BR/><BR/>karen:<BR/><B>This is all the figment of the imagination of some extraterrestrial conspiratorial historian.</B><BR/>Oh, my, that's even FARTHER out there! ;)<BR/><BR/>CB:<BR/><B>The thing is, I bet Young Earthers are going, "Well, that's absurd!"</B><BR/>Yeah, you have to go a LONG way to get those wack-a-doofs to pronounce something absurd.<BR/>Hey, you might like <A HREF="http://freethunk.net/cynic-intelligent-design-party/the-cynic-intelligent-design-party.php" REL="nofollow">this</A>.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-14826443158386494822007-03-26T10:52:00.000-07:002007-03-26T10:52:00.000-07:00LOL.The thing is, I bet Young Earthers are going, ...LOL.<BR/><BR/>The thing is, I bet Young Earthers are going, "Well, that's <I>absurd!</I>"Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13363174213866492800noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-1339529310692788972007-03-26T09:03:00.000-07:002007-03-26T09:03:00.000-07:00Oy veh!The historians get their facts from textboo...Oy veh!<BR/>The historians get their facts from textbooks and Hollywood movies! I'd say this guy is off by several centuries. Facts weren't facts till the invention of the Gutenberg press and celluloid film! <BR/>I am now a YOUNG YOUNG YOUNG earther, and he's a conspirator, trying to make earth seem middle-aged!<BR/><BR/>Wait, I think instead, that earth doesn't even exist yet. This is all the figment of the imagination of some extraterrestrial conspiratorial historian.<BR/><BR/>THAT's the ticket! 1+1=-5Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-8929787135784202772007-03-26T03:05:00.000-07:002007-03-26T03:05:00.000-07:00Now THAT'S a conspiracy theory.And extremely well ...Now THAT'S a conspiracy theory.<BR/><BR/>And extremely well orchestrated by all accounts as the majority of the people in the world must have been in on the deception. I guess he didn't get the email and was one of the last to know..<BR/><BR/>These sorts of claims completely flumux the mind. Now I tend to agree that political powers and religious powers probably get up to dodgy stuff that they don't let the rest of us know about,(that might be part of my conspiratorial mind), but a scam like that would take an omnipotent being to enact it!<BR/><BR/>I just solved the riddle. God did it.beepbeepitsmehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12931640447011071849noreply@blogger.com