tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post4135452483095377081..comments2023-07-08T06:13:19.344-07:00Comments on biblioblography: JACK CHICK CAN KISS MY ASS...Krystalline Apostatehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-19992091345712082192007-03-12T23:02:00.000-07:002007-03-12T23:02:00.000-07:00BBIM - you should check out Chick's tricks.http://...BBIM - you should check out Chick's tricks.<BR/>http://www.chick.com/default.asp<BR/>He's anti-Catholic, pro-KJV - he's a real nutter, all right.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-17088669749710209752007-03-12T13:57:00.000-07:002007-03-12T13:57:00.000-07:00Sadie - yes, he is entitled to copyright his mater...Sadie - yes, he is entitled to copyright his material. But parody isn't infringement. <BR/>You can't copyright a concept, as the big lawsuit between Quattro Pro & Microsoft established (in re: other companies creating their own spreadsheet programs). Besides which, it was barely even marginal. <BR/>Between fair-use & freedom of speech, I'd say that Hallis caved a little too easily.<BR/>For more on this:<BR/>http://www.publaw.com/parody.html<BR/>Besides which, Chick tracts are distributed freely. This doesn't mean they're public domain, but there's a lack of profit margin which comes into play.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-29261024650993551082007-03-12T13:40:00.000-07:002007-03-12T13:40:00.000-07:00So I don't get what you're angry about or why Chic...So I don't get what you're angry about or why Chick should kiss your ass. Is it because this other artist was using the art and content of Chick's tracts without permission so Chick shut it down? Are you mad because Chick called him to the mat on Copyright infringement?<BR/>I'm not a fan of tracts or scare tactics but the guy is entitled to copyright his material, yes?Sadie Louhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07362158642491145353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-45631640052963344192007-03-12T12:41:00.000-07:002007-03-12T12:41:00.000-07:00Yes! That's absolutely the worst part! That's wh...<I>Yes!</I> That's absolutely the worst part! That's what makes the queasy feeling in my stomach about Chick tracts.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13363174213866492800noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-31618853895300724662007-03-12T12:25:00.000-07:002007-03-12T12:25:00.000-07:00chris - the worst part is, Chickie-boy isn't kiddi...chris - the worst part is, Chickie-boy <I>isn't</I> kidding. He's as serious as a heart attack.Krystalline Apostatehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09044558668644447375noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20169168.post-457070099997284402007-03-12T10:44:00.000-07:002007-03-12T10:44:00.000-07:00I, too, am an admirer of HPL since my teens, so I ...I, too, am an admirer of HPL since my teens, so I got a huge kick out of the parody.<BR/><BR/>Still, the horrible truth is that Jack Chick's tracts are, really, even more heavy handed and horrific than the parody! I like the parody. I appreciate the parody. I do this in part because I can laugh at the parody without a queasy feeling in my stomach that this is to be taken seriously. But it . . . isn't <I>as extreme</I> as a lot of the stuff Chick, himself, has written.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13363174213866492800noreply@blogger.com